Not the argument that abortion is wrong because it intentionally kills an innocent human being. Not the argument that the unborn are persons because they are individual substances of a rational nature. Not even the Biblical argument that abortion is wrong because the unborn are human beings, and God has commanded payday advance us not to murder Exodus 20:13, Deuteronomy 5:17), that God hates the shedding of innocent blood (Proverbs 6:16-19), and that child sacrifice had never even entered into God's mind to command (Jeremiah 19:5).
These are the arguments that she does interact with: -Ultrasound technology has made personhood arguments more persuasive to people. While this is true, this is certainly not the argument pro-life people make for why the unborn are persons.
Personhood depends on what something is, not what it looks like. In other words, this inspired psalmist taught a continuity of identity from the womb. After all, taken literally it would seem that God was saying we existed prior to our payday loans no credit check, which is not an orthodox Christian payday advance view.
It would seem that the point of these verses is not to teach that unborn children are alive so much as to show God's foreknowledge. The punishment is for war crimes, not for surgical abortions chosen by the woman and performed by a licensed professional. I haven't really looked into this, so I'll take her word for it.
As I mentioned above, there are better verses payday loans no credit check use, ones that Shlesinger doesn't respond to. Shlesinger's response here is that John the Baptist was past the point of quickening, and this was a special one, as the one chosen to herald the arrival of Christ, so using it to support fetal personhood is a stretch.
At least for this passage, Shlesinger's response is less than persuasive. So to quickly recap, this is a book to skip. Not only is her argument just a rehash of the feminist argument and she doesn't add anything new to the discussion, but she also doesn't have knowledge of the literature on abortion. There are better books out there. Posted by Clinton Wilcox at 8:20 PM 2 comments: Links to this post Email ThisBlogThis.
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest Labels: Kira Shlesinger, Pro-Choice and Christian Wednesday, September 6, 2017 The Kids Aren't Alright: Should We Set a Limit on Having Kids.
Large families, they reason, are one of the leading factors in global warming, so to combat global warming, we should limit our family sizes to two children. But therein lies one of the problems: how many kids should each family have. It seems like each couple is different, depending on their circumstances. So while one couple might only be able to have one or two kids, some could have eight, nine, or even more and be able to give all the kids the individual attention they need. I know people who have a lot of kids and their children are not suffering in any way.
Another pretty glaring problem is, how do you plan for these families. So having a small family is not part of the Christian model, and the fact that any time you have sex it can result in pregnancy seems to indicate that small families were never intended for us. But if, for example, Catholic moral philosophers are right and using contraception is immoral, then limiting your family through contraceptive means would also be immoral.
They argue that large families are not sustainable and limiting our family sizes has the most potential for mitigating climate change and its effects. They claim that multiple studies have shown this, except that they link to an article on The Guardian which talks about one study that showed that having one fewer child will help lower your carbon emissions. Of course, this study also says that the next best things you can do are sell your car, avoid long flights, and eat a vegetarian diet.
So clearly their claim has not been adequately supported. Instead, Having Kids would rather you keep your family small and give your resources to other families who need them to provide a fair start for their kids.
This is inconsistent reasoning. Taking kids into consideration when planning a family is a good thing. Telling people they should limit the number of kids they have when there are other alternatives to achieve your desired result is not.
Posted by Clinton Wilcox at 5:00 PM No comments: Links to this post Email ThisBlogThis.
Here's more info on payday advance review our webpage.